Argh! Please start putting relevant details into:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/VaryProcessing That way we can have a proper list of whats required. Adrian On Thu, Jun 12, 2008, Mark Nottingham wrote: > These issues may be relevant: > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/37 > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/38 > > If I understand correctly, Henrik is talking about a case where these > two responses might be seen from an origin: > > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Content-Type: application/foo > Cache-Control: max-age=30 > Content-Encoding: gzip > Vary: Accept-Encoding > > [ gzip'd content ] > > > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Content-Type: application/foo > Cache-Control: max-age=30 > > [ plain content ] > > > > > On 12/06/2008, at 10:57 AM, Benno Rice wrote: > > > > >On 11/06/2008, at 10:24 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > >>On Wed, Jun 11, 2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > >>>On ons, 2008-06-11 at 17:50 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >>> > >>>>Are there any objections to removing this patch from Squid-2.HEAD > >>>>and > >>>>documenting this discussion (and other Vary related stuff) on a > >>>>wiki page? > >>> > >>>No problem. > >> > >>Ok. I'll commit a reversal of the patch later on. > > > >If someone can provide me with an example of a request/response > >pattern that provokes the incorrect behaviour, I'll happily try and > >fix the patch up. > > > >-- > >Benno Rice > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -
