On tor, 2008-06-12 at 09:56 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Yes, but there's more to Vary processing than this bug - eg, the > "unable to establish vary_id for XXX", possible Vary storage/retrieval > improvements, etc.
unable to.. is one of the effects of this bug.. Squid hitting an internal state which it is not meant to hit.. > I think it would be beneficial for us to document all the crazy issues > (and our solutions) relating to Vary processing. Vary as such isn't that crazy, only our implementation or any other trying to implement vary with some efficiency.. but it takes a while for the concept to sink in properly. The current Vary processing really should be thrown out entirely, and replaced with something thought ground up instead of just trying to patch over.. Regards Herik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
