Hi Henrik,
At 23.42 05/10/2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On sön, 2008-10-05 at 14:29 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> The users who have needed to use it recently pretty much overrule
> complete removal in 3.1.
>
> Does squid_smb_lm_auth cover everyones understanding of it?
Like to keep the ntlm part if possible as it's a good indication of what
auth_param class the helper may be used from, even if the helper as such
only support lanman level subset of NTLMSSP.
Correct, but things are very confused here.
Currently we have four ntlm helpers:
fakeauth_auth
mswin_ntlm_auth
no_check.pl
ntlm_auth
So, now any kind of naming convention is missing ..... :-(
What about something like this ?
fake_ntlm_auth
mswin_ntlm_auth
no_check_ntlm_auth.pl
lm_ntlm_auth
Regards
Guido
-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
