On mån, 2008-10-06 at 23:37 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > For now, if people agree to the above, I can make _just_ the current > 'ntlm_auth' helper name match that scheme. > Or, given the current +3/-1 votes change it to smb_lm_auth if no > agreement on a naming scheme alteration.
Don't count my reservation as a - But I do think a naming convention would be a healty thing. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
