> On sön, 2008-10-19 at 14:09 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > >> I know this is an old thread, but if somebody is going to work on this, >> please add some logic/options that would allow the peer to stay "up" >> after N sequential failures. The current Squid2 monitoring code is not >> usable in busy environments with occasional isolated failures between >> essential peers. > > Yes, there need to be a dampening function. > > I don't know why we (me @ MARA) didn't implement that when the feature > was first implemented in Squid rproxy patch. We already had such > implementations in many other similar tests outside Squid for well known > reasons.. > > Thanks for the reminder. Now were do we place this so it's not forgotten > again? A feature page?
Done. Bugzilla http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2185 Amos
