fre 2012-04-13 klockan 11:44 -0300 skrev Marcus Kool: > There is no formal definition in the RFC of what a "file extension" > is. So the question is: is the file extension of > http://zzz.com/1409303.mp4?p1=2012-xxx > "mp4" ?
The use of file extension is a major bug in the ICAP protocol imho. > If yes, I will file a bug report. I think so. But it's non-trivial to define what an file extension is in HTTP terms as you probably know. Last in URL-path? Embedded in query parameters? From Content-Disposition? Derived from Content-Type? Regards Henrik
