On 04/16/2012 04:34 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
sön 2012-04-15 klockan 22:07 -0300 skrev Marcus Kool:
Are you saying that you want to use the Content-Type header as the
main guide for determining the "file extension" ?
Yes, when there is a usable content-type.
The idea itself is good. The problem is that it is very different
than what the ICAP RFC states. I think that the negation of filtering
based on Content-Type should use a new parameter, e.g. Ignore-Content-Type.
And lets not forget that Transfer-Ignore based on a part of the URL
can be used for REQMOD and RESPMOD while Ignore-Content-Type can
only be used for RESPMOD.
This has a small performance impact: there will be more ICAP traffic
since less can be ignored.
Anyway, clarity is the most important thing here and I suggest to
move this discussion to the ICAP discussion forum.
Clarity in a pile of mud...
Hahaha. Do you propose to make a ICAP2 standard that is not backwards
compatible?
Regards
Marcus
