mån 2012-04-16 klockan 09:40 -0300 skrev Marcus Kool:
> The idea itself is good. The problem is that it is very different
> than what the ICAP RFC states.
Is it?
A list of file extensions that ...
It says "file extensions". What is a "file"?
In my mind the closest to "file" is what you get on your harddrive when
you download something, and there is no direct map url -> file
extension. The file extension is derived from a combination of
content-type, content-disposition and URL.
> I think that the negation of filtering
> based on Content-Type should use a new parameter, e.g. Ignore-Content-Type.
That's a useful replacement.
Regards
Henrik
