Hi Eliezer
I've never used ICAP, and I think hacking the code is way faster than
creating/using a separate service for that. And I'm not sure, but I
don't think I can manage to get this done with current squid's options.
This patch will make squid NOT ignore the objects with "*Vary: **"
replies. It will consider them a valid and cacheable object.
And it will only consider as a valid Vary option those who *begins
*with"accept" or the "user-agent" one.
--
Best Regards,
Heiler Bemerguy
Network Manager - CINBESA
55 91 98151-4894/3184-1751
Em 21/10/2016 16:07, Eliezer Croitoru escreveu:
Instead of modifying the code, would you consider to use an ICAP service
that will mangle this?
I am unsure about the risks about doing so but why patch the sources if you
can resolve it with the current mainstream capabilities and API?
Eliezer
----
Eliezer Croitoru <http://ngtech.co.il/lmgtfy/>
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
Behalf Of Heiler Bemerguy
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 18:21
To: squid-us...@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Caching http google deb files
Hello,
I've limited the "vary" usage and gained some hits by making these
modifications (in blue) to the http.cc code:
while (strListGetItem(&vary, ',', &item, &ilen, &pos)) {
SBuf name(item, ilen);
if (name == asterisk) {
/* vstr.clear();
break; */
continue;
}
name.toLower();
if (name.cmp("accept", 6) != 0 &&
name.cmp("user-agent", 10) != 0)
continue;
if (!vstr.isEmpty())
vstr.append(", ", 2);
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
