On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Rudolf Potucek wrote: > P.S.: I found one website that claimed that it had newer content and > didn't want to be cached, so I assume that all the other ones > (microsoft.com, google.com, ...) should be cacheable, right?
Right.. if it wasn't for the fact that the HTML content on these sites is dynamically generated. See the cacheability check engine for interesting reading on what is cachable or not and why. Regards Henrik
