On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 - both cases are useful. > > > On 10/07/2008, at 1:15 AM, Chris Woodfield wrote: > >> Bug filed, #2406. >> >> As I annotated in the bug report, this behavior does have its uses, but >> not having access to the URL pre-rewrite is clearly broken behavior IMO. My >> idea solution would restore 2.6's behavior, but also add a logformat code to >> log the URL post-rewrite in addition to pre-rewrite if desired. If no >> rewriter is configured, this element would print null.
+1 - I agree. -- /kinkie
