On ons, 2008-07-16 at 09:34 +0200, Kinkie wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 - both cases are useful.
> >
> >
> > On 10/07/2008, at 1:15 AM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> >
> >> Bug filed, #2406.
> >>
> >> As I annotated in the bug report, this behavior does have its uses, but
> >> not having access to the URL pre-rewrite is clearly broken behavior IMO. My
> >> idea solution would restore 2.6's behavior, but also add a logformat code 
> >> to
> >> log the URL post-rewrite in addition to pre-rewrite if desired. If no
> >> rewriter is configured, this element would print null.
> 
> 
> +1 - I agree.

Should be fixed now, together with a couple of related bugs..

Regards
Henrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to