Amos Jeffries-2 wrote: > > On 04/03/11 04:58, mbruell wrote: > >> Should we be seeing traffic on the lo interface when it's all working >> correctly? The packet count on lo is very low, and doesn't change when >> trying to proxy the traffic. >> > > Okay, try adding the special route table to eth0 as well. If that still > fails try adding it to wccp0. > I'd like to know the results here. It works on lo for some but seems > not everyone, though I have not yet had concrete confirmation that it > matters. >
Can you give me an example of this? I don't quite know what this would be. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Client-timing-out-when-using-squid-as-tproxy-tp3243429p3333776.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
