On 04/03/11 06:21, mbruell wrote:
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote:
On 04/03/11 04:58, mbruell wrote:
Should we be seeing traffic on the lo interface when it's all working
correctly? The packet count on lo is very low, and doesn't change when
trying to proxy the traffic.
Okay, try adding the special route table to eth0 as well. If that still
fails try adding it to wccp0.
I'd like to know the results here. It works on lo for some but seems
not everyone, though I have not yet had concrete confirmation that it
matters.
Can you give me an example of this? I don't quite know what this would be.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4#Routing_configuration
I've updated the config to show eth90 as well as lo. Since many people
seems to require it on the main interface.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.11
Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.5
