Josep, >> For most of things, it is. 1.4.1 has a cleaner, better looking GUI. It > is also >> (at least) slightly faster (your milleage might vary). But I had > troubles, as >> seen in the mailing list >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=5757346
I have replied to your question (and the same applies to all questions regarding 1.4.1 and "Bogus sequence in UID FETCH" with uw-imap, also called "Threaded mailbox bug") one hour after it showed up in the list ;) See http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=5757891 or http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/12443 To sum it up, either get a 1.4.2 from cvs or a nightly build, or wait for it to come out officially, or patch your 1.4.1 using the patches that were attached with my answer. And regarding uw-imap, I wouldn't be as hard as other people ;) uw-imap is fully rfc3501 (the IMAP rfc) compliant (it IS rfc3501 somehow ;) It is not bad in performance if you don't use the unix mailbox storage backend, and it's the only imap server I know of that supports unix mailbox storage. (The only thing I regret in uw-imap is that it has been written in plain C instead of C++). Of course, if you want the best performance, then you should take an imap server that has been optimized for one storage backend like Cyrus. But if you want easy setup and unix mailbox compatibility, then uw-imap seems to be the preferred choice. Alex. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com. Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs available today? From careers in IT to Engineering to Tech Sales, Dice has tech jobs from the best hiring companies. http://www.dice.com/index.epl?rel_code=104 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
