On 11/30/05, Paul Lesneiwski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Reverting back to SquirrelMail/1.4.5 [CVS] solved it. > > 1.4.5 has been released, so 1.4.5cvs is not very accurate unless you > speak of a pre-release cvs snapshot of 1.4.5 (in which case now you are > vulnerable to several known security issues).
What do you think? I have clearly been on the CVS updates until now, generally if one speaks of "reverting back" it will be a previous version, and usually it's the last one before when the problem started. Duh. So far not one remark from your end related to the actual problem at hand. What is this mailinglist for anyway? If you're not up for really helping anyone, skip the comments and don't offer users a mailinglist like this. -- J ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: [email protected] List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
