Andrew Gray wrote:
>
> OK, thanks for that, I think ....
>
> As I read it, I am installing the software on a machine and selling *it* as
> a service, but that's OK as long as I include the original source code on
> the hard drive of the machine (the physical medium), and any patches applied
> (ie qmail scanner, etc). Since the customer wants no advertising on the web
> mail interface, I have removed all copyright notices by editing the html
> template files. All copyright notices embedded in the html code (as
> comments) and source code remain intact.
>
> Is this OK? I'm not a C programmer, so I'm not about to hack any code
> anyway.
>
> Andrew.
Hi,
As far a the Qmail part goes, you should talk to DJB. If you distribute
patched versions of his software, you need his prior approval. An
installed Qmail-scanner is a modified version of Qmail, since it
replaces the qmail-queue binary.
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
-------
If you want to distribute modified versions of qmail (including ports,
no matter how minor the changes are) you'll have to get my approval.
This does not mean approval of your distribution method, your
intentions, your e-mail address, your haircut, or any other irrelevant
information. It means a detailed review of the exact package that you
want to distribute.
-------
This is already off topic for the sqwebmail list, so I'll end it here.
Good luck.
Regards,
Mike
