Yes, I am seeing the same behavior as Malachi. Users are not able to authenticate at all without authdaemond running.
The problem is so fustrating because it is so intermittant... -----Original Message----- From: Malachi de AElfweald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] Problem with 3.3.7 I did that, but still can't get sqwebmail to EVER authenticate ANY user... Malachi 10/4/2002 10:29:36 AM, "Massimo Rizzotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I had the same problem. >You don't havo to compile the authdameond. If yuo use vpopmail and the >authvchkpw metod to autenticate You don't nedd it. Here is my >configuration opptions: > >--enable-webpass=vpopmail \ >--without-authdaemon \ >--without-authpam \ >--without-authuserdb \ >--without-authpwd \ >--without-authshadow \ >--without-authldap \ >--with-authvchkpw \ > >I hope it could help you. >Have Fun >Massimo Rizzotto > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Donald Maner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:39 PM >Subject: [sqwebmail] Problem with 3.3.7 > > >Hello, > > I'm using qmail and vpopmail for my mail folders. I'm having a >wierd authentication problem, and hopefully someone here has come >across this before. > > It's a really wierd problem because it only affects some of the >domains. After starting up authdameond, some domains get one login or >two logins, then it quits authenticating them. Other domains have no >problems, and I have yet to find a pattern. I can restart >authdameond.plain, and it works for one or two logins (it may be time >and not number-of-logins based) and then for the same domains as >before, it quits working again. > > The accountholders can still pop their mail, and the fact that >restarting authdameond alleviates the problem for a second leads me to >believe the problem lies with sqwebmail, but the lack of any meaningful >logging (or my lack of knowledge on how to turn said logging on) leaves >me very little to work with. So I was hoping someone here has some >idea of where to start... > >Thanks. >Donald Maner > > >
