Sir, I modified the authdaemonrc as said and restarted the authdaemond. Now its starting the authdaemond.ldap when i run -"/usr/local/share/sqwebmail/libexec/authlib/authdaemond start". But still can not log in. ------------------------------------------------------------ INVALID USER ID OR PASSWORD Please try again. ------------------------------------------------------------ Also the tcpdump on LDAP server does not show any packets coming from the sqwebmail machine. Do we need to have courier-imap also on the same machine of sqwebmail. In my case its presently on Qmail/LDAP/IMAP/POP3 server.
regards, Suhag. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Candler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "suhag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 4:26 PM Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] can not login thro Sqwebmail > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:17:05PM +0530, suhag wrote: > > Hi, > > > > # ls -l /usr/local/share/sqwebmail/libexec/authlib/ > > total 212 > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 16400 Jul 31 12:19 authdaemon > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 407 Jul 31 12:19 authdaemond > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 60200 Jul 31 12:19 authdaemond.ldap > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 59112 Jul 31 12:19 authdaemond.mysql > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 46528 Jul 31 12:19 authdaemond.plain > > -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 7608 Jul 31 12:19 authdaemon.passwd > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1813 Jul 31 12:19 authsystem.passwd > > > > This time i used, --with-authldap --without-authpgsql, so its starting > > authdaemond.mysql but not authdaemond.ldap. > > I apologise - I misread the script. I thought that authdaemond.ldap would > take precedence over the others, but it's the other way round. > > By default: > * if you have authdaemond.pgsql, it will use it > * else if you have authdaemond.mysql, it will use it > * else if you have authdaemond.ldap, it will use it > * else it will use authdaemond.plain > > But you can override that, by editing authdaemonrc and changing > > version="" > > to > > version="authdaemond.ldap" > > Try that... hopefully we are getting one step closer :-) > > Regards, > > Brian. > >
