I look at pams parameters too...
Cheers, Francois At 11:11 14/08/2003 +0100, Cowle, Leon wrote:
And /etc/pam.d/webmail is present and contains:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pam.d]# more webmail #%PAM-1.0 # # $Id: sqwebmail-system-auth.pamconf,v 1.1 2001/02/02 07:06:36 mrsam Exp $ # # Copyright 1998-2001 Double Precision, Inc. See COPYING for # distribution information. # # This is a sample authpam configuration file that uses pam_stack # (circa linux-pam 0.72).
auth required pam_nologin.so auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth account required pam_stack.so service=system-auth session required pam_stack.so service=system-auth
That's where my handy suggestions would end... But I think we've made SOME progress by getting the right authdaemon running.
--Leon.
-----Original Message----- From: NOC (EUROFMC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:59 AM To: Cowle, Leon Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [sqwebmail] Sqwebmail and Redhat 9
Yes it's listed in the running daemons list (with ps -auxw, i.e) :
root 23314 1 0 09:38 ? 00:00:00 /usr/local/webmail/libexec/authlib/authdaemond.plain start root 23319 23314 0 09:38 ? 00:00:00 /usr/local/webmail/libexec/authlib/authdaemond.plain start
At 10:55 14/08/2003 +0100, Cowle, Leon wrote: >Stupid question.... Did you stop and restart the authdaemon process? Is >the authdaemond.plain now listed in a ps -ef output...? > >--Leon. > >-----Original Message----- >From: NOC (EUROFMC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:47 AM >To: Cowle, Leon; 'Brian Candler' >Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [sqwebmail] Sqwebmail and Redhat 9 > > >Thanks for all Leon. > >I've modified authdaemonrc with version=autdaemond.plain, ...but that's >still the same problem... > >Any more ideas ? > >Cheers, > >Francois >At 10:30 14/08/2003 +0100, Cowle, Leon wrote: > >Never too old to learn... I humbly stand corrected. > > > >Thanks Brian! > > > >--Leon. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Brian Candler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:14 AM > >To: Cowle, Leon > >Cc: 'NOC (EUROFMC)'; 'Valentin Ionescu'; 'Juha Saarinen'; > >'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > >Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] Sqwebmail and Redhat 9 > > > > > >On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:08:30AM +0100, Cowle, Leon wrote: > > > Francois, > > > > > > Did you see my posting.....? > > > > > > <snip> > > > You can also check if it is starting authdaemond.plain instead of > > > authdaemond.mysql/authdaemond.pgsql/authdaemond.ldap -- might be > > > useful to force it to start the .plain one for troubleshooting > > > purposes (comment out the relevant lines in > > > /path/to/sqwebmail/libexec/authlib/authdaemond)... > > > <snip> > > > >There is a better way to force one particular authdaemond variant to > >be > >run: just set > > > >version="authdaemond.plain" > > > >(or whichever version you want) in authdaemonrc. > > > > > > > > > > --Leon. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: NOC (EUROFMC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:02 AM > > > To: Valentin Ionescu; Juha Saarinen > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] Sqwebmail and Redhat 9 > > > > > > > > > Thanks for this information Valentin. > > > > > > ...but I've ever the same problem. > > > > > > I've noted this fact : > > > - in Redhat 8, it is authdaemond.plain wich runs > > > - in Redhat 9, it is authdaemond.ldap wich runs... > > > I've however runned ...../authdaemond start .. > > > > > > Francois > > > At 11:04 14/08/2003 +0300, Valentin Ionescu wrote: > > > >It's not a problem with RH9 because I started using > > > >qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail about two months ago and my first > > > >qmail+vpopmail+platform was > > > >Linux Red Hat 9. > > > > > > > >Besides the problem with authdaemon that gives that "invalid > > > >login id or password" everything was a success. In order to > > > >override this problem I've added a crontab entry that restarts > > > >authdaemond every 1 minute. > > > > > > > >BTW, at my place I was encountering the invalid login in the next > > > situation: > > > > -login with a [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -authenticate ok > > > > -logout > > > > -then, anyone who would try to login using a shorter > > > >username was facing the invalid login message. > > > > And the only way to give him acceess to his email through > > > >sqwebmail was to restart authdaemon. > > > > From what I've seen on this list it's a vpopmail issue and I > > > >don't know if they solved'it yet. > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "NOC (EUROFMC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >To: "Juha Saarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Sent: 14 August, 2003 10:38 > > > >Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] Sqwebmail and Redhat 9 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Juha, but that is not the problem : the sqwebmail cgi > > > > > is OK > > > > > : > > > > > I obtain the login dialog. > > > > > > > > > > ...and service sqwebmail not exists in fact. > > > > > > > > > > I confirm that authdaemond runs. > > > > > > > > > > No, it is really a problem with Redhat 9 : sqwebmail has been > > > > > installed with the same manner on a Redhat 8 machine and runs > > > > > very well... > > > > > > > > > > Francois Monnet > > > > > > > > > > At 19:30 14/08/2003 +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Check the permissions on the sqwebmail binary in your cgi > > > > > >directory > > > > > >-- should be -r-sr-sr-x. Also check that the sqwebmail > > > > > >authentication daemon is started ('service sqwebmail start' > > > > > >as root or with sudo). > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > > > >Juha Saarinen > > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, NOC (EUROFMC) wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With the helpes of Jim an Brian I've installed sqwebmail > > > > > > > with success > > > >... > > > > > > > on Redhat 8.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Redhat 9, the compilation and install was correct, but > > > > > > > when I'll > > > >log to > > > > > > > the webmail, all logins are refused. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A compatibility problem between authdaemond and Redhat 9 > > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any idea ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > -- > > > -- > > > -------- > > > This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of >the > > > designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended > >recipient of > > > this message you are hereby notified that any review, > > > dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly > > > prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only > > > and should not be regarded > >as > > > an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any > > > financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or > > > as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission > > > cannot be guaranteed to > >be > > > secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this > >information is > > > complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. > > > All information is subject to change without notice. > > > > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >-- > >------- > >This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the > >designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient >of > >this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, > >distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This > >communication is for information purposes only and should not be > >regarded >as > >an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any > >financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as > >an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot > >be guaranteed to >be > >secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this > >information >is > >complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All > >information is subject to change without notice. > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >------- >This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the >designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of >this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, >distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This >communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as >an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial >product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official >statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be >secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is >complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All >information is subject to change without notice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice.
