Never too old to learn... I humbly stand corrected. Thanks Brian!
--Leon. -----Original Message----- From: Brian Candler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:14 AM To: Cowle, Leon Cc: 'NOC (EUROFMC)'; 'Valentin Ionescu'; 'Juha Saarinen'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] Sqwebmail and Redhat 9 On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:08:30AM +0100, Cowle, Leon wrote: > Francois, > > Did you see my posting.....? > > <snip> > You can also check if it is starting authdaemond.plain instead of > authdaemond.mysql/authdaemond.pgsql/authdaemond.ldap -- might be > useful to force it to start the .plain one for troubleshooting > purposes (comment out the relevant lines in > /path/to/sqwebmail/libexec/authlib/authdaemond)... > <snip> There is a better way to force one particular authdaemond variant to be run: just set version="authdaemond.plain" (or whichever version you want) in authdaemonrc. > > --Leon. > > -----Original Message----- > From: NOC (EUROFMC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:02 AM > To: Valentin Ionescu; Juha Saarinen > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] Sqwebmail and Redhat 9 > > > Thanks for this information Valentin. > > ...but I've ever the same problem. > > I've noted this fact : > - in Redhat 8, it is authdaemond.plain wich runs > - in Redhat 9, it is authdaemond.ldap wich runs... > I've however runned ...../authdaemond start .. > > Francois > At 11:04 14/08/2003 +0300, Valentin Ionescu wrote: > >It's not a problem with RH9 because I started using > >qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail about two months ago and my first platform > >qmail+vpopmail+was > >Linux Red Hat 9. > > > >Besides the problem with authdaemon that gives that "invalid login id > >or password" everything was a success. In order to override this > >problem I've added a crontab > >entry that restarts authdaemond every 1 minute. > > > >BTW, at my place I was encountering the invalid login in the next > situation: > > -login with a [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -authenticate ok > > -logout > > -then, anyone who would try to login using a shorter username > >was > >facing the invalid login message. > > And the only way to give him acceess to his email through > >sqwebmail was to restart authdaemon. > > From what I've seen on this list it's a vpopmail issue and I don't > >know if they solved'it yet. > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "NOC (EUROFMC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Juha Saarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: 14 August, 2003 10:38 > >Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] Sqwebmail and Redhat 9 > > > > > > > Thanks Juha, but that is not the problem : the sqwebmail cgi is OK > > > : > > > I obtain the login dialog. > > > > > > ...and service sqwebmail not exists in fact. > > > > > > I confirm that authdaemond runs. > > > > > > No, it is really a problem with Redhat 9 : sqwebmail has been > > > installed with the same manner on a Redhat 8 machine and runs very > > > well... > > > > > > Francois Monnet > > > > > > At 19:30 14/08/2003 +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote: > > > > > > >Check the permissions on the sqwebmail binary in your cgi > > > >directory > > > >-- should be -r-sr-sr-x. Also check that the sqwebmail > > > >authentication daemon is started ('service sqwebmail start' as root > > > >or with sudo). > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Juha Saarinen > > > > > > >On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, NOC (EUROFMC) wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > > > With the helpes of Jim an Brian I've installed sqwebmail with > > > > > success > >... > > > > > on Redhat 8.0 > > > > > > > > > > On Redhat 9, the compilation and install was correct, but > > > > > when > > > > > I'll > >log to > > > > > the webmail, all logins are refused. > > > > > > > > > > A compatibility problem between authdaemond and Redhat 9 ? > > > > > > > > > > Any idea ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------- > This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the > designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of > this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, > distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This > communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as > an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial > product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official > statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be > secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is > complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All > information is subject to change without notice. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice.
