On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:08:30AM +0100, Cowle, Leon wrote: > Francois, > > Did you see my posting.....? > > <snip> > You can also check if it is starting authdaemond.plain instead of > authdaemond.mysql/authdaemond.pgsql/authdaemond.ldap -- might be useful to > force it to start the .plain one for troubleshooting purposes (comment out > the relevant lines in /path/to/sqwebmail/libexec/authlib/authdaemond)... > <snip>
There is a better way to force one particular authdaemond variant to be run: just set version="authdaemond.plain" (or whichever version you want) in authdaemonrc. > > --Leon. > > -----Original Message----- > From: NOC (EUROFMC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:02 AM > To: Valentin Ionescu; Juha Saarinen > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] Sqwebmail and Redhat 9 > > > Thanks for this information Valentin. > > ...but I've ever the same problem. > > I've noted this fact : > - in Redhat 8, it is authdaemond.plain wich runs > - in Redhat 9, it is authdaemond.ldap wich runs... > I've however runned ...../authdaemond start .. > > Francois > At 11:04 14/08/2003 +0300, Valentin Ionescu wrote: > >It's not a problem with RH9 because I started using > >qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail about two months ago and my first platform was > >Linux Red Hat 9. > > > >Besides the problem with authdaemon that gives that "invalid login id > >or password" everything was a success. In order to override this > >problem I've added a crontab > >entry that restarts authdaemond every 1 minute. > > > >BTW, at my place I was encountering the invalid login in the next > situation: > > -login with a [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -authenticate ok > > -logout > > -then, anyone who would try to login using a shorter username was > >facing the invalid login message. > > And the only way to give him acceess to his email through > >sqwebmail was to restart authdaemon. > > From what I've seen on this list it's a vpopmail issue and I don't > >know if they solved'it yet. > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "NOC (EUROFMC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Juha Saarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: 14 August, 2003 10:38 > >Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] Sqwebmail and Redhat 9 > > > > > > > Thanks Juha, but that is not the problem : the sqwebmail cgi is OK : > > > I obtain the login dialog. > > > > > > ...and service sqwebmail not exists in fact. > > > > > > I confirm that authdaemond runs. > > > > > > No, it is really a problem with Redhat 9 : sqwebmail has been > > > installed with the same manner on a Redhat 8 machine and runs very > > > well... > > > > > > Francois Monnet > > > > > > At 19:30 14/08/2003 +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote: > > > > > > >Check the permissions on the sqwebmail binary in your cgi directory > > > >-- should be -r-sr-sr-x. Also check that the sqwebmail > > > >authentication daemon is started ('service sqwebmail start' as root > > > >or with sudo). > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Juha Saarinen > > > > > > >On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, NOC (EUROFMC) wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > > > With the helpes of Jim an Brian I've installed sqwebmail with > > > > > success > >... > > > > > on Redhat 8.0 > > > > > > > > > > On Redhat 9, the compilation and install was correct, but when > > > > > I'll > >log to > > > > > the webmail, all logins are refused. > > > > > > > > > > A compatibility problem between authdaemond and Redhat 9 ? > > > > > > > > > > Any idea ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the > designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of > this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, > distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This > communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as > an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial > product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official > statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be > secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is > complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All > information is subject to change without notice. > > >
