On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:34:47AM +0000, Paul L. Allen wrote:
> > > Exchange allows vacation messages (done
> > > sensibly, not the qmailadmin/autoresponder broken way).
> > 
> > Now that I *strongly* disagree with. Exchange's autoresponders are
> > totally broken.
> 
> I have never, ever used Exchange, so I had to go by what others told
> me.

I just go by the high annoyance factor of receiving Exchange autoresponses
from people subscribed to mailing lists.

> > > Riwos has sounds?  I am glad I didn't find the test account.  Seriously,
> > > I can see some people liking them.  But they'd have to be something you
> > > could enable or disable as a preference.
> > 
> > You can (and it's off by default). But it's an unnecessary option IMO; it
> > simply shouldn't be there in the first place. Smacks of "hey I'm clever, I
> > can code HTML which makes sounds in your browser".
> 
> Actually, some people would find it useful, believe it or not.  You're
> busy working in another window and oblivious to the passage of time.  Hours
> later you remember to check your mail and see that you received an urgent
> message a couple of hours ago.

That would be useful, but I don't think it notifies you on incoming mail;
it's more like background sounds (at least, only the "Sea" scheme says it
has sound)

It would be hard to arrange anyway - server push? Client auto-refresh every
60 seconds?

Cheers,

Brian.

Reply via email to