Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2019, 18:10:48 CET schrieb Ionut Razvan Ionita: > My name is Ionut and I am a new developer in VoIP dev team in 1&1. Maybe > you can help me with the following problem. I have the following scenario: > UAC sends invite to UAS via Kamailio proxy, UAS responds with 491. I am > trying to catch the ACK from the UAC in siptrace module using > TMCB_ACK_NEG_IN. I successfully trace this message but it's not the only > one. I get an INVITE request which I don't want to trace since the callback > is called ACK_NEG_IN. From my understanding, this call is issued right > after the ACK is sent to the UAS, which, for me, doesn't seem to be > correct, since the callback should trace in ACKs not outs. TM code that's > calling this callback is in t_reply.c:2291. Is this a bug? I can fix this > issue easily in my code by checking whether or not the current message is > an ACK in siptrace but it would be great if we would work for a fix to this > issue.
Hello Ionut, tm fairly is complex, difficult to comment without more context and digging deeper into it. Can you reproduce this easily or does it happens only in special cases? I would suggest to create an issue on our github tracker about it, with some additional information as suggested in the bug template there. Best regards, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services Kamailio security assessment - https://skalatan.de/de/assessment _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
