For the records, this is now discussed on the issue tracker: - https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1871
Cheers, Daniel On 26.02.19 22:31, Henning Westerholt wrote: > Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2019, 18:10:48 CET schrieb Ionut Razvan Ionita: >> My name is Ionut and I am a new developer in VoIP dev team in 1&1. Maybe >> you can help me with the following problem. I have the following scenario: >> UAC sends invite to UAS via Kamailio proxy, UAS responds with 491. I am >> trying to catch the ACK from the UAC in siptrace module using >> TMCB_ACK_NEG_IN. I successfully trace this message but it's not the only >> one. I get an INVITE request which I don't want to trace since the callback >> is called ACK_NEG_IN. From my understanding, this call is issued right >> after the ACK is sent to the UAS, which, for me, doesn't seem to be >> correct, since the callback should trace in ACKs not outs. TM code that's >> calling this callback is in t_reply.c:2291. Is this a bug? I can fix this >> issue easily in my code by checking whether or not the current message is >> an ACK in siptrace but it would be great if we would work for a fix to this >> issue. > Hello Ionut, > > tm fairly is complex, difficult to comment without more context and digging > deeper into it. > > Can you reproduce this easily or does it happens only in special cases? I > would suggest to create an issue on our github tracker about it, with some > additional information as suggested in the bug template there. > > Best regards, > > Henning > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC, USA -- www.asipto.com _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
