On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo<[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/8/6 Klaus Darilion <[email protected]>: >>> At the same time, we could implement support for other URI's, like XMPP >>> since we have an xmpp gateway. >> >> Yes, should be generic as RFC 3261 which allows all kind of URIs > > Well, I can't agree. A SIP proxy shouldn't implement a HTTP URI in a > request, or a mailto URI, even if RFC 3261 says "any URI".
Why not? > AFAIK the only URI's to implement wouuld be: > - SIP > - SIPS > - TEL > - URN Why URN yes and HTTP not? Jan. _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
