Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > You can still use one interface though - MI is fully available and does > (pseudo) async xmlrpc commands.
that is not true if you use modules from both s and k (like domain domain module, for example, that is much more advanced in s). besides, s xmlrpc interface is much better that k's, because it each call executes a config file route block, that allows (among other things) access control. -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
