Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > :-) -- ahh, yes, imo, srctl sort of exists already, but is called > kamctl.
are you saying that one can control s modules with kamctl? i know that one can control both s and k modules with serctl (except for async t_uac_dlg). -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
