Hi Andrei, Thank you for this detailed answer.
Indeed, update to 0.9.7 will be more easier than SER 2.0. Our priority is to avoid a lot of bugs. We are not able to reproduce the crash...so we'll see. Probably we will do an update to 0.9.7. Regards, Adrien Le mercredi 09 septembre 2009 à 13:11 +0200, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul a écrit : > On Sep 04, 2009 at 18:06, inge <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Andrei, > > > > I wonder what is involved in migration to SER 2.0 versus 0.9.5. I read > > that UID is used now to identify the users instead of username for > > example, so we can anticipate impacts on internal processes and SERWeb. > > Yes, uid and did (for domains) are now used internally. > There is a script which might help in migrating a database: > http://www.iptel.org/ser/migrate_db > > > > > Can I find a detailed list which these changelog ? > > Try > http://www.iptel.org/basic_changes_in_configuration_file_0 > http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ser;a=blob;f=ser/NEWS;h=02543746 > http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ser;a=blob;f=ser/ChangeLog;h=f97521 > > I don't remember exactly, hopefully there is a more complete migration > guide somewhere (maybe somebody else can help if I missed anything). > > > > Is it not more reasonnable to migrate in 0.9.7? Mainly to solve our > > initial bug with Seg Fault and optionnaly to have new features. > > Yes, in your case migration to 0.9.7 should be painless (there are no > config or db changes, only bugfixes, so you wouldn't need to change > anything). > > Andrei _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
