El Sábado, 19 de Septiembre de 2009, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul escribió: > However one can override it, by simply adding branches in the failure > route (the ideea being that if you add a branch in the failure route, > you know what you're doing an you want forking re-enabled). If I understand > correctly this is mostly equivalent to disable_6xx_block=1, at least for > the voicemail scenario. > > Am I correct in assuming that we don't need it, because sr handles this > automatically?
You miss the usual case in which there is parallel forking and a "wrong" UAS replies 603 "Decline" (instead of a better 480 code). The 603 reply makes the proxy cancelling the parallel branch (still ringing in other branch) and this is, commonly, an undesirable behaviour. So IMHO, "disable_6xx_block" as it's implemented in Kamailio TM module should also exist in SR as its funcionality is not covered by the current code. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
