Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul schrieb:
On Nov 09, 2009 at 13:08, Juha Heinanen <[email protected]> wrote:
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:

 > I have somewhere a function that does just that (using the above
 > format). I used it a long time ago for load balancing (IIRC lb added
 > received="..." to nated contacts when forwarding to the proxies behind
 > it and removed "received" from r-uri, set the proper send socket based
 > on dstip and the destination based on the received=uri when forwarding a
 > message from a proxy to the outside world).
 > I can create a new module for it (if it's  not already in one of
 > them).

andrei,

there is a long thread on this and the needed functions have already
been written.

You will need also to save the local ip:port on which the packet is
received by the proxy. They will be needed when forwarding a packet with
and alias in r-uri, to make sure the same socket/ip:port will be used
for sending (or else it won't work with nats if you have several listen
addresses).

Isn't that already handled by record-routing? AFAIK RR header contains the socket on which the request was received, and if incoming and outgoing socket differ, then double-RR is used. Thus, isn't the send-socket not already set after loose_route()?

This already works fine with fix_nated_contact(), and the new alias_... functions do not change routing, the just preserve the original contact URI.

regards
klaus





_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to