On 12/10/09 1:08 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> t_on_reply("1"); - run onreply_route[1] with no locking (default, same
> syntax as now) for current transaction.
> t_on_reply("1", "0"); - run onreply_route[1] with no locking for current
> transaction.
> t_on_reply("1", "1"); - run onreply_route[1] under lock for current
> transaction.
fine, if t_on_reply("1") is equal to t_on_reply("1", "1"). this is very
important for backwards compatibility and error prevention.
t_on_reply("1", "0") is then for optimization purpose.
that was a proposal. Maybe others can have different opinions. I need
this option in several cases, not that often. Note that in K it is by
default off. So in case you do not have set the tm parameter
onreply_avp_mode to 1, then it is eqiuvalent of t_on_reply("1", "0").
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
* http://www.asipto.com/
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
