I agree, 403 would work. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Edson - Lists <[email protected]> wrote:
> As far as Alice and Bob have the same interpretation, yes. > > The problem here, isn't the blocking message itself, but the way it will be > interpreted by both sides... The best would be have some kind of blocking > message/mechanism that would leave no doubts about the real reason of the > block. Believing that all Alices and Bobs out there would have the same > interpretation is, at least, a flaw point. > > But again, "403 Forbidden" for the SUBSCRIBE would work for sure. > > > Edson. > > Iñaki Baz Castillo escreveu: > >> 2010/2/24 Edson - Lists <[email protected]>: >> >> Not very polite, neither enlightenment... I can image that Alice and Bob >>> would never talk each other again, 'cause they would think that the other >>> wan't to have other's 'contact'.... :) >>> >> >> Well, IMHO is worse if the presence server replies 200 for the >> SUBSCRIBE and inmediately rejects the subscription with a NOTIFY >> containing "Subscription-status: terminated;reason=rejected". In this >> way it really seems that bob has blocked alice. >> In the other hand, if the proxy responsible for bob rejects the >> SUBSCRIBE from alice with 403 it's clear that it's a >> realm/inter-provider issue. >> >> > _______________________________________________ > sr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev > -- Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Marcus Hunger - [email protected] Telefon: +49 (0)211-63 55 55-61 Telefax: +49 (0)211-63 55 55-22 sipgate GmbH - Gladbacher Str. 74 - 40219 Düsseldorf HRB Düsseldorf 39841 - Geschäftsführer: Thilo Salmon, Tim Mois Steuernummer: 106 / 5724 / 7147, Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE219349391 www.sipgate.de - www.sipgate.at - www.sipgate.co.uk
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
