Hi > 2010/3/17 Klaus Darilion <[email protected]>: > > Hi! > > > > I have not followed the whole discussion. I just had an idea which > > might be > > useful: Why not hook up dialog module with tm module? Tm module > > already knows the state of forked INVITE transaction, which > ones are > > in early states, and which branch is the winner. > > This is not valid for the case in which a dialog is forked by > a proxy behind our proxy. From the point of view of TM it's a > single transaction. >
In tm/dlg.c there is: new_dlg_uac/new_dlg_uas The dialog-in/dialog-out model seems to be similar to this b2b uac/uas? Any one can explain the difference between tm/dlg and dialog module, and in which case should they be used? Kind Regards Min Wang > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > sr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.790 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2752 - Release > Date: 03/17/10 03:33:00 > _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
