2010/5/27 Miklos Tirpak <[email protected]>: > Well, I think there is a major difference even with negative responses in > case of parallel forking. t_reply() immediately sends back a final reply and > cancels the pending branches. change_reply_status() affects only a single > branch that may not win at the end.
Thanks for the clarification. It makes sense as if the proxy sends a final reply to the UAC it must terminate the pending branches. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
