Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: > > i don't think so, because currently there can be more than one gw group > > for the same instance_id, prefix, priority, and from_uri. if priority > > is the same, it just means that the user does not care, which gw group > > is tried first. > > Yes but in my proposal it wouldn't be valid. Those rules should have a > different priority value (constrain). IMHO it makes sense as the > random behavior should just occur for gateways within same group > (based on weight).
we cannot make invalid rules that previously have been allowed. what comes to randomizing the rules, yes, it could be added. -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
