Hola,
Henning Westerholt wrote: >>> Maybe you have an idea on this; I will continue thinking about it. In >>> any case, the "always decrement counter during BYE processing" isn't >>> strictly required for the designated fix if the "deny proxy-initiated >>> call termination for non-confirmed calls" rule is in effect. That's >>> because confirmed dialogs should always transition to the terminated >>> state on processing of the BYE request and thereby decrement the counter. > > If the "proxy deny" change is enough to fix the problem about the leaking > dialogs in this certain case, then maybe we should only change this so far, > especially as there are still at least one fix left (tm delete timer dlg) > which haven't been commited so far. Agreed. Putting it on the agenda for the new improved implementation should suffice for the moment. I will soon note down in the wiki dialog proposal what we have discussed so far. >>> Too much thinking about dialog today. I need a break. :) >> Ok, I also need a break to see the goal again and again XDDD > > Hehe, you've not that much goals in the last games, so i understand. ;-) Iñaki's law: "As an sr-dev thread grows longer, the probability of him teasing others with the fact that the Spanish national football team won the 2010 world cup approaches 1." :) ¡Viva diálogo! --Timo _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
