Hello,
On 8/28/11 9:43 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
daniel,
i started to add support to mtree for integer values and allowing
each node to have more that one value.
this would be much easier, it i would not need to support the
currently undocumented MT_TREE_DW value type. can i drop MT_TREE_DW
value type from the implementation or do you need it? if support for
MT_TREE_DW is needed, it would be easier for me to leave the current
module alone and write a new version of the module.
keep the MT_TREE_DW. The module should have to the flexibility of being
able to deal with different modes, no matter of what kind, to be
specified on a per tree basis -- an update for the next devel cycle. The
current mode 1 is not only about storing integer values, but some
sorting of the values as well. I don't think a new module makes sense,
since such modes will be wanted there at some point ...
I was thinking to some generic design, like a profile for tree value
type, to have:
- a function for parsing before caching and store compiled value in tree
(in a container structure)
- a function for matching - meaning to add the matched value in a list
- a sorting function for the list
- a conversion from the internal list to config (e.g., to avp/pv/xavp)
- a function to free the cached value (for shutdown cleanup)
... and maybe more as needed.
So adding a new type means implementing a generic interface, without
messing with the tree structure and navigation through it.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
