Alex Hermann writes: > Is local mtree branch supposed to track master? ... > From the above commands, I don't see why it should. Local branch jh tracks > origin/jh/mtree, not master. So why would a master change suddenly appear in > the jh branch? I would expect changes you push to origin/jh/mtree to > appear in your local jh branch after a pull, nothing else.
if jh/mtree tracks master (as it according to the wiki page is supposed to do) and when jh tracks remote branch jh/mtree, then according to normal logic it follows that also jh tracks master. -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
