2011/9/6 Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]>: >> Please, make it possible for the Via transport to contain an unknown >> token, at least when it does NOT occur in the top Via header. Why >> should Kamailio care about the second Via transport field? > > Hi, any comment about this report please? I've tryed to figure how to > change the Via transport parser in order to allow any token (as > RFC3261 states) but I've got lost within the hyper-optimized parser :)
Hi, some comment please? :( This issue is breaking a new SIP transport we have proposed: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ibc-rtcweb-sip-websocket-00 Thanks a lot. PS: I will try to modify the Via parser so it allows any token in the Via transport field. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
