Hey Daniel,
On 15.09.2011 11:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>> It might be helpful for the project if more of us try to connect to >>> the #kamailio and #sip-router channels more frequently. >> Speaking of ways to improve IRC, the following ideas come to my mind: >> >> - Shut down #Kamailio and let it point at #sip-router instead. I see no >> real benefit in maintaining two distinct channels. > Does IRC support this kind of channel name aliasing, e.g., #kamailio and > #sip-router to end up in the same channel? I think I looked for such > option, but didn't find it. I was just assuming that it worked somehow because I often find myself being forwarded. By virtue of Google, I found this blog post which claims that it is in fact feasible: http://www.geekshed.net/2010/03/can-i-link-two-channels/ Money quote: "Linking two channels together is very easy, as it only involves setting two channel modes – the first sets a limit of X people that can be in the channel, and the second sets the channel to send people to after X people have joined the main channel. [...] So if I wanted to forward my channel #Inara to #Adria, I would do the following: /mode #Inara +lL 1 #Adria. If I wanted to always have the channel set like that, so that nobody could change it, I would use chanserv’s mlock option, and do: /msg chanserv set #Inara mlock +lL 1 #Adria." HTH, --Timo _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
