2011/10/10 Juha Heinanen <[email protected]>: >> What are you proposing then Juha? not implementing RFC 5626 and >> continuing with custom solutions that don't work well? continuing with >> Contact rewritting? No please. > > what comes to nat traversal, what are the problems with contact > rewriting? so far it has worked quite well for me.
It's a hack! and it breaks SIP protocol as the UA should see a RURI matching its Contact in incoming requests, rather than a rewritten URI. I cannot understand how the current hack should be preferred instead of implementing RFC 5626. "It seems to work with current hack" should not be a valid argument IMHO. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
