Hey Henning, Ahh, thanks for that, thats perfect for now!
A pity, those names should have been a little more descriptive ;) Thanks Jason On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Henning Westerholt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 03 November 2011, Jason Penton wrote: > > For Asserted and preferred identities, we don't need to parse the > content, > > but in other headers I have not gotten to yet, we may need to. > > Hi Jason, > > do you talk about p-asserted and p-preferred header? This are fairly > standard > headers, there are even some PVs to access them right now i think. > > > Please help me understand, I would have thought from an architecture > > perspective, we would populate the sip_msg structure with all possible > sip > > headers as well as the parsers. What is the reason we don't do this > > currently? performance? > > I'd guess the reasons is memory efficiency. The structure get bigger and > bigger with every pointer. But for p-asserted and p-preffered, they are > already included it seems: > > struct hdr_field* pai; > struct hdr_field* ppi; > > Best regards, > > Henning >
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
