14 dec 2011 kl. 16:46 skrev [email protected]: > Dne 13.12.2011 v 16:16:54, IĂąaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> napsal: > >>> Adding jingle support to existing one seems way better. >>> Sure, if both clients support only incompatible sets of codecs, then it >> won't >>> work. >> >> It's not just that. SIP uses a plain/raw SDP format while XMPP uses a >> XML version of SDP. Just an example of the hard task a SIP-XMPP-proxy >> should fulfill to enable full interoperability between both words. > > Sure.. it would be a bit easier (measured in lines of code) if one could > simply > forward SDP around. > Doing some kind of conversions & keeping it light/fast/reliable is harder than > sending what I received. > > I thought about putting the feature as a transport on a jabber server, but > then > it would have to act as a sip router as well, creating way more complications > and issues. > > Maybe I should try poking around first.. If you give me some more directions > / > possible issue information, I can find out how hard it is and stop asking.
It's much easier to do this in a b2bua like Asterisk - which already has it, than in a proxy. I don't see the point of trying to bridge a SIP call with a jingle call in a proxy. Maybe you can explain that? /O _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
