On Dec 3, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Ovidiu Sas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello all, > > By inspecting the source code, the only difference that I could see > between kamailio and ser flavours is that kamailio has support for the > "tm:local-request". > Are there any constrains in having the tm:local-request present for ser > flavour? > Does it make sense to continue to build two flavours? > My suggestion would be to focus one one single flavour and go forward > with it for the next release. I'm in favor of that. I've actually modified the source to use tm:local-request with the ser flavour quite a bit in testing. I haven't run into any problems, though my testing was far from comprehensive. andrew _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
