Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > yes. Or, for getting the branch, if they become with too many > parameters, then use the function that returns the pointer to the branch > structure.
if we do that, then for consistency, get_branch and next_branch should be dropped altogether and replaced by get_sip_branch (which already exists) and get_next_sip_branch (which would be new). i can do that if people feel that it is ok. -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
