I did a small table of found duplicates, the same question is: which modules are valid ? +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | module_name | modules | modules_k | modules_s | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | acc_radius | | x | x | | auth_db | | x | x | | auth_radius | | x | x | | cpl-c | | x | x | | domain | | x | x | | exec | | x | x | | ldap | | x | x | | maxfwd | | x | x | | nathelper | | x | x | | permissions | | x | x | | pike | | x | x | | registrar | | x | x | | rr | | x | x | | textops | | x | x | | uri_db | | x | x | | usrloc | | x | x | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+
2012/12/13 Konstantin M. <[email protected]> > Hello, > > Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see: > loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so" > > but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules > but existing in modules_k and modules_s both. > Which one is a valid ? > > > > >
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
