There is an ongoing effort to merge duplicate modules or move them into the obsolete folder. Most used ones are from modules_k.
-ovidiu On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Konstantin M. <[email protected]> wrote: > I did a small table of found duplicates, the same question is: which modules > are valid ? > +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ > | module_name | modules | modules_k | modules_s | > +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ > | acc_radius | | x | x | > | auth_db | | x | x | > | auth_radius | | x | x | > | cpl-c | | x | x | > | domain | | x | x | > | exec | | x | x | > | ldap | | x | x | > | maxfwd | | x | x | > | nathelper | | x | x | > | permissions | | x | x | > | pike | | x | x | > | registrar | | x | x | > | rr | | x | x | > | textops | | x | x | > | uri_db | | x | x | > | usrloc | | x | x | > +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ > > > 2012/12/13 Konstantin M. <[email protected]> > >> Hello, >> >> Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see: >> loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so" >> >> but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules >> but existing in modules_k and modules_s both. >> Which one is a valid ? _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
