@Simon Yes, when either caller or callee is behind symmetric NAT, I want to activate RTP proxy. I think that makes sense
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Simon Perreault <[email protected] > wrote: > Le 2013-03-05 13:20, Alex Balashov a écrit : > > Many router out there are using Full cone NAT. >>> >> >> Yes, but how does full cone NAT change the treatment you must give to >> the SIP client on the far (proxy) end? >> > > I guess he wants to activate RTP proxying for clients behind a symmetric > NAT only. > > Simon > > > ______________________________**_________________ > sr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**dev<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev> > -- Khoa Pham HCMC University of Science Faculty of Information Technology
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
