Hi,
I've noticed that the config file parser allows for un-named branch and
failure routes (see failure_route_stm and branch_route_stm in cfg.y)
The core cookbook says that these routes are only run when armed with
t_on_failure/t_on_branch, and a quick test confirms that.
Should default failure and branch routes be removed from cfg.y?
Hugh
--
Hugh Waite
Principal Design Engineer
Crocodile RCS Ltd.
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
